[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4752: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4754: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4755: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4756: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
www.gcvets.net - View topic - Sarvik's balance mod suggestions


Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

This forum is dedicated to the ones who take care about Ground Control mods and creating maps.

Moderator: Moderators

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: 27 Jan 2012 17:21

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby Sarvik » 28 Jul 2015 14:24

Would be nice if a few more people commented. I know we can count on nOx to strongly support any changes that enable new ways to kill beams, but the rest is still unclear. :mrgreen:

Btw Stat, are you aware of any special limitations about meddling with air units we should be aware of before letting imagination run wild? Like could they be made stealthy? Could they theoretically shoot arty special weapons? How likely it is that game will not crash if we give them drone special weapon?

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 322
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 12:08
Location: united states

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby shpooky » 28 Jul 2015 16:31

why would air need arty/drone specials sarvik?


"I know we can count on nOx to strongly support any changes that enable new ways to kill beams"
LOL

stat could you plzz fix hell fire? :D
and also increase bullet speed for cray or make all of crays tanks have homing missiles ? either would be good(but i like the idea of a missile spec on cray scouts that would help them kill ond scouts and beams)



//////people who actually play cray should be the only ones talking on this topic in my opinion. Why? cause people who just play OND have a biased opinion or just don't know how cray works........

and i kinda suspect that some players in this community don't want to make cray and ond balanced factions and just want to keep ond the dominant faction

so players who actually like to play cray should be the only ones to talk

(this thread is a cray players only zone :D)
me,stat,whitenight,sarvik,mind,carter,etc
(keep in mind this is not official and i have no power D:)//////(<this is all a suggestion and is probably a bad one) you can go along with it or not
i only work in cyan and sometimes really really bright blue :D so bright it burns your eyes!!!!!

(if you have any questions don't be afraid to PM me or you can contact me via email ddavidshpak@aol.com)

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 322
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 12:08
Location: united states

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby shpooky » 28 Jul 2015 17:04

would giving cray heavy's a equipment that increases their armor value be possible? (like power plant increases speed)
one that would block special weapons but not normal weapons?
(increase the armor piercing of normal weapons but keep or decrease the armor piercing of specials)
(and make the armor piercing of marines and crusaders specials higher so that they can still kill heavy's from the front)

and we could make it so that its back armor is weakened to the point that lights and inf can damage them from behind (with their normal weapons) just to make their be a great weakness to the equipment and to give the impression that the tanks are taking their armor from behind and adding it to their frontal armor

idk if this would be too OP of a equipment or not

tell me what you think......
i only work in cyan and sometimes really really bright blue :D so bright it burns your eyes!!!!!

(if you have any questions don't be afraid to PM me or you can contact me via email ddavidshpak@aol.com)

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 303
Joined: 05 Mar 2012 06:32
Location: United States

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby stAtrill » 28 Jul 2015 18:27



Another GC archive:

Real Member
Posts: 52
Joined: 23 Apr 2013 12:32
Location: Italy

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby DarixIta » 28 Jul 2015 20:15

@shpooky play some rebellion mod or stats blance mod, you will have lots of fun with that. Balance mod had a spec on lights and scouts which is exactly what you ask for.
@stat you did make tests with ballistic on air; we played it one night on wartornwastes, might be a vid of it too. AC on attack aeros, to counter ams, and it worked.
I did like a second spec on drone too, and the mole missile ninja mentioned seems like a fitting spec for drone carrier.

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 322
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 12:08
Location: united states

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby shpooky » 28 Jul 2015 22:56

to darix: i like the idea of a mole missile on drone

problem is darix no one plays those mods anymore D:




to stat: it was just a suggestion stat :D

no control over armor values? D:

to all: oh and by the way why the hell are we talking about air?

we dont even have the ground units balanced yet!
i only work in cyan and sometimes really really bright blue :D so bright it burns your eyes!!!!!

(if you have any questions don't be afraid to PM me or you can contact me via email ddavidshpak@aol.com)

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 105
Joined: 27 Jan 2012 17:21

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby Sarvik » 29 Jul 2015 09:40


Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 322
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 12:08
Location: united states

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby shpooky » 29 Jul 2015 16:21

"Not to mention that ground units are actually pretty solid"

step 1: play a game with cray vs ond and record it
step 2: if score on both teams is not far apart or cray wins show me the video
step 3: then you can say that again and ill agree
Last edited by shpooky on 29 Jul 2015 16:32, edited 1 time in total.
i only work in cyan and sometimes really really bright blue :D so bright it burns your eyes!!!!!

(if you have any questions don't be afraid to PM me or you can contact me via email ddavidshpak@aol.com)

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 322
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 12:08
Location: united states

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby shpooky » 29 Jul 2015 16:25

why are you putting everything on speed!? this is the ond faction your talking about its already fast enough!
and your trying to make defensive/offensive faster than balanced?

and if every load out is as fast as the speed load out doesn't that make speed pointless?

i play with all my units on balanced(exception is the scout)and i consider that better than taking all my units on speed

why do you want to make everything as fast as speed?
making the units as fast as balanced is good enough for me
they don't need to be any faster D:'

(i feel as if my brain died during this post)
and im not going to fix it
Last edited by shpooky on 30 Jul 2015 16:55, edited 3 times in total.
i only work in cyan and sometimes really really bright blue :D so bright it burns your eyes!!!!!

(if you have any questions don't be afraid to PM me or you can contact me via email ddavidshpak@aol.com)

Board-General
User avatar
Posts: 322
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 12:08
Location: united states

Re: Sarvik's balance mod suggestions

Postby shpooky » 29 Jul 2015 16:33

shpooky wrote:
//////people who actually play cray should be the only ones talking on this topic in my opinion. Why? cause people who just play OND have a biased opinion or just don't know how cray works........

sarvik wrote:
1. This is ridiculous.
2. I have also suggested changes to OND in this topic, in fact my suggested change to ground units defensive mode could easily have more impact then other stuff here.

i was fucking around
i only work in cyan and sometimes really really bright blue :D so bright it burns your eyes!!!!!

(if you have any questions don't be afraid to PM me or you can contact me via email ddavidshpak@aol.com)

PreviousNext

Return to Ground Control - Mods | Maps

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests